Should Italy Have Had A Red Card


Answers ( 4 )


    In the World Cup semi-final between Italy and Germany, one of the most controversial incidents occurred in the 82nd minute. Italian player Marco Materazzi was head-butted by French player Zinedine Zidane. The referee only showed a yellow card to Zidane, meaning he could stay on the field and play for the rest of the game. Italy ended up losing the game, and many people believe that if Zidane had been given a red card, things would have turned out differently. In this blog post, we will explore whether or not Italy should have had a red card during the World Cup semi-final match against Germany. We will discuss the incident itself, as well as the possible implications of a red card for both teams.

    What is a Red Card?

    A red card in soccer is a form of ejection from the game, typically given to a player for committing a serious infraction such as violent conduct or swearing at an official. A player who receives a red card must leave the field of play immediately and can not be replaced by another player, resulting in his team being shorthanded for the rest of the match.

    Why was Italy not given a Red Card?

    In the first half of the match, Italy was shown four yellow cards and one red card. In the second half, they were shown two more yellow cards and no red cards. This is why Italy was not given a red card.

    The referee may have been lenient with Italy because they were already down a man due to the red card in the first half. Or, he may have felt that Italy was not being particularly aggressive in the second half and didn’t warrant another red card. It’s also possible that the referee simply made a mistake in not showing Italy a red card in the second half.

    What could the consequences have been if Italy had been given a Red Card?

    If Italy had been given a red card, the consequences could have been disastrous. Italy could have been forced to leave the World Cup, and their fans would have been devastated. Additionally, the Italian team would have missed out on an opportunity to compete for the title, and their coach would have been angry and disappointed.

    What are people saying about the decision?

    Some people are in support of the decision, arguing that it was the right call given the circumstances. Others are critical of the decision, believing that Italy should have been allowed to continue playing with 11 men. Some people have also pointed out that this decision could have major implications for the rest of the tournament.

    Should Italy Have Had A Red Card

    The answer to this question is a resounding yes! Italy should have had a red card in their match against Spain. Here’s why:

    1. Spain was clearly the better team. They outplayed Italy for most of the match and deserved to win.

    2. Italy’s decision to play defensive football was negative and it ultimately led to their downfall.

    3. Italy’s players were constantly fouling Spanish players and committing other dangerous plays. A red card would have been a fitting punishment for their recklessness.

    4. Spain’s players were subjected to numerous nasty tackles and other forms of rough play from Italian players. A red card would have sent a strong message that such behaviour is not acceptable.

    5. Italy’s goalkeeper made a number of dangerous saves that could have easily resulted in goals for Spain. A red card would have been justified given his repeated infringement of the rules.


    Italy’s controversial performance in the 2018 FIFA World Cup left many fans and viewers unsatisfied. From questionable calls by VAR to a lack of discipline when it came to tackling, Italy was not at their best throughout the tournament. This begs the question: should Italy have had a red card?

    To understand why they may have deserved one, we must look no further than their match against Spain on June 17th. A total of 24 fouls were committed during the match with 11 made by Italian players. Italy’s defenders assumed aggressive postures which led to several hard tackles and dangerous challenges that could have resulted in serious injury for Spanish players. In addition, there were at least two instances where Italy received yellow cards for similar offenses that could have easily been red cards if not for leniency from referees.


    Italy should have had a red card.

    The world was shocked when Italy failed to qualify for the 2018 World Cup. It was a major disappointment for the football-loving nation, and sparked a wave of criticism of the Italian Football Association (FIGC).

    One of the biggest criticisms leveled against the FIGC was that they had failed to properly address the issue of racism in the Italian game. Italy has a long history of racism in football, and fans and players alike have been subjected to racial abuse.

    It has been argued that the FIGC should have taken a firmer stance against racism, and that they should have issued a red card to Italy in order to send a clear message that racism will not be tolerated. Such a stance would have demonstrated to the world that Italy is serious about tackling racism in the game.

    Unfortunately, the FIGC chose not to take such action, and the result is that racism continues to blight the Italian game. This is a sad state of affairs, and it is clear that more needs to be done to tackle this issue.

    The FIGC should take a stronger stance against racism in the game, and a red card should be issued to any team that is found guilty of racial abuse. This would send a clear message to players and fans alike that racism is not acceptable.

    It is a shame that the FIGC chose not to take such action when Italy failed to qualify for the 2018 World Cup. Such a stance would have sent a powerful message to the world, and would have been a much-needed step towards tackling racism in the game.


    It’s hard to deny that Italy had a tumultuous World Cup in 2018. From the opening whistle to the final whistle, Italy were far from the country that had won four World Cup titles. In the end, Italy were the only one of the top five European football nations to miss out on the tournament entirely.

    But, what if Italy had been given a red card? What could have been different?

    To start, Italy would have had a much better chance of advancing from their group. With the exclusion of Italy, their group would have been made up of Poland, Senegal, and Colombia. Italy had a strong chance of coming out on top, but without their presence, the group would have been much more open.

    Furthermore, Italy would have had a much better chance at making a deep run in the tournament. With the red card, Italy would have been able to face off against the likes of Germany, France, and Brazil. Italy have been known to be a defensive minded side, and would have been able to take advantage of the extra time they would have had in order to prepare a proper defensive strategy.

    Finally, Italy would have had a much better chance of getting to the knockout stages. With the red card, Italy would have been able to play with an extra defender, which would have been a huge advantage for them. Italy have been known for their prowess in the defensive third, and having an extra defender could have been the difference between them advancing and not.

    It’s easy to look back and say that Italy should have had a red card, but the reality is that we will never know. But, one thing is for sure: the 2018 World Cup would have been a much different tournament if Italy had been given a red card.

Leave an answer